Legal Opinion

Southern Surety Co. v. Jay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1918No. 8313PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County ; R. P. DeCraffenreid, Judge. Action for injunction hy Maggie Jay and others against the City of Muskogee, the Southern Surety Company, and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, its motion for neiw trial overruled, and the Southern Surety Company brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

This action was begun in the district court of Muskogee county, Okla., by Maggie Jay, T. F. King, and Gertrude B. Hudson, defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, against the Oity of Muskogee, a municipal corporation, Charles Wheeler, Jr., city clerk, Con-nell Rogers, county treasurer and Southern Surety Company, defendants, for the purpose of enjoining the collection of certain special assessments levied against the property of plaintiffs located in block 419 in said city. The purpose of the assessments so levied against the property of plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City of Muskogee v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Partridge v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Baldwin v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Mulligan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. City of Enid v. GensmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API