Legal Opinion

Wells v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 22, 1964No. [No. 22, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

In this prosecution for a violation of the narcotic drugs statute, the principal questions on appeal relate to the legality of the arrest of the defendant (Ernest B. Wells), the legality of his punishment as a subsequent offender and the constitutionality of the sentence imposed on him as a multiple offender. Other questions concern the admissibility of an oral confession, the manner of its obtention, and its free and voluntary character. Still other questions involve the propriety of limiting the cross-examination of a state witness. Lastly, it is suggested that the evidence was insufficient…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Felkner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Abbott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Shupe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API