Legal Opinion

Mary G. Hartman v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 4, 1996No. 95-3734PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

Mary G. Hartman (“Petitioner”) appeals the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) 1 dismissing for lack of jurisdiction Petitioner’s appeal of her removal from the position of Deputy Clerk at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Under 5 U.S.C. § 7513, an appeal to the Board is limited to “employee[s] against whom an action is taken under this section.” 5 U.S.C. § 7513(d) (1994). 2 The Board found that Petitioner was not an “employee” as defined under 5 U.S.C. § 7511(a)(1), and therefore was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warren S. Forest v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. A. Charles Brodt v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Williams v. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dotson v. GriesaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Dotson v. GriesaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Larry J. Butler v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Semper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API