Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Zentz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2006No. 04-BG-1206, 04-BG-1347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated disciplinary proceedings against respondent Carl E. Zentz, a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that reciprocal and functionally identical discipline be imposed in the form of a public censure. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.

On September 19, 2002, the Court of Appeals of Maryland reprimanded respondent, by consent, for disciplinary violations in which he acknowledged violating Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. In Re BridgesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re HerminaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. In Re PageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In re IweanogeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. In re RobbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In re SalattiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API