People v. Valdez
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (W. A.), Acting P. J.
Direct victim restitution is mandatory in all cases in which the victim has suffered economic loss as a result of the defendant’s criminal conduct and the defendant is denied probation. (Gov. Code, 1 § 13967, subd. (c).) The defendant in this case, Juan Valdez, was convicted of robbery upon his plea of guilty and was denied probation. He was ordered to pay a restitution fíne, but direct restitution to the victim was not ordered despite evidence of economic loss. The question we address is whether the trial court erred when it failed to order victim…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. BroussardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. OganesyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. Brittany L.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.