People v. Rowland
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Having determined that its original sentencing of appellant Peter Louis Rowland was invalid for lack of an award of victim restitution, the trial court resentenced him to include such an award in the sum of $143,517.33. On appeal, appellant argues the award must be stricken because (1) the original sentence was valid; and (2) he was not advised of the award as a consequence of his plea of no contest and has suffered resulting prejudice. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment.
Background
In 1995, the People filed a 22-count information against appellant alleging…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. BroussardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ZitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. Surety Bond Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. ThygesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. MearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. BuffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.