Legal Opinion

Albee v. Lamson & Hubbard Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 12, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The respondents have excepted to an order requiring them to permit the petitioner, a stockholder in the respondent corporation, to examine certain corporate records, accounts and documents. The bill of exceptions states that the case came on to be heard on the petition and answer, and that the judge entered an order which, after stating that "it was agreed” by the respondents that "the facts were as set forth in the petition,” ordered the respondents to allow an examination of four different classes of records, books and documents.

The petition for a writ of mandamus alleged that the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Commonwealth v. AndlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Stone v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Karcher v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Varney v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hanrahan v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  2. Scott v. Manager State Airport, Hanscom FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Gavin v. PurdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Kalanges v. Champlain Valley Exposition, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. Chitwood v. Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API