Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Andler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 25, 1924PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This complaint, made by one Comiskey, “ agent for H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., a corporation,” charges that the defendant at a specified time and place “ did have in his possession registered vessels, to wit, fifty-nine registered bottles marked H. P. Hood & Sons, Registered, without the written consent of the owner, the said H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., against the peace of the said Commonwealth, and contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided.” There was a verdict of guilty. Sentence of fine was imposed but its execution stayed.

This complaint sets out no crime known to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Paige v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Maker v. BouthierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Commonwealth v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Commonwealth v. StasiunMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. ConroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. Mark v. KahnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API