Commonwealth v. Andler
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This complaint, made by one Comiskey, “ agent for H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., a corporation,” charges that the defendant at a specified time and place “ did have in his possession registered vessels, to wit, fifty-nine registered bottles marked H. P. Hood & Sons, Registered, without the written consent of the owner, the said H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., against the peace of the said Commonwealth, and contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided.” There was a verdict of guilty. Sentence of fine was imposed but its execution stayed.
This complaint sets out no crime known to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Paige v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Maker v. BouthierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Commonwealth v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Commonwealth v. StasiunMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. ConroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Mark v. KahnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.