Legal Opinion

Painter v. Home Finance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1957No. 92PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Decision here is controlled by Chapter 1143, Session Laws of 1955, now codified as G.S. 55-38.1. This statute provides in pertinent part:

“(a) Every foreign corporation shall be subject to suit in this State, by a resident of this State . . . whether or not such foreign corporation is transacting or has transacted business in this State and whether or not it is engaged exclusively in interstate or foreign commerce, on any cause of action arising as follows:
“(4) Out of tortious conduct in this State, whether arising out of repeated activity or single acts, and whether arising out of misfeasance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Smyth v. Twin State Improvement Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  3. Compania De Astral, S. A. v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  4. Merrell v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Lambert v. SchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Atkins v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Arterbury v. American Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. St. Clair v. RighterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1966
  4. Hodge v. Sands Manufacturing CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Jackson v. National Linen Service CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API