Legal Opinion

Ludlow Corp. v. Textile Rubber & Chemical Co.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 6, 1978No. Civ. A. No. C75-143RPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.

This case involves an action for patent infringement based upon U.S. Reissue Patent No. 27,366. The patent at issue was the product of an April 13, 1965 application for Letters Patent on a process for making foam rubber which is dried without the use of gelling agents and without gelling the wet foam.

Pending before the court is defendant’s motion for separate trial. Defendant contends plaintiff and its predecessor holders of the patent at issue failed to comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 102. Defendant contends the patent is invalid on any one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woburn Degreasing Co. v. Spencer Kellogg & SonsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  2. Cataphote Corporation v. DeSoto Chemical Coatings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1964
  3. Electronic Assistance Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HeinemannUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Choat v. Rome Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API