Hirschfield v. Hirschfield

Odell Hirschfield appeals an order denying his motion to expunge child support arrearages. He argues that the trial court erred by preventing him from' presenting evidence that he made payments directly to or spent money on the parties’ children and by preventing him from raising the defense of laches. Because the defense of laches is not available in this type of action and because the record indicates that the trial court in its discretion denied the expungement after accepting Odell’s offer of proof as fact, we affirm the order.

While Odell was not paying child support, the children’s…