Legal Opinion

In Re Paternity of John RB

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2005No. 03-1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 1. Because we conclude that retroactive applications of Wis. Stat. § 767.32(lm) and (lr) (2000-01) 1 do not violate Dorian H.'s (Dorian) right to due process, we affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2. In 1982, Dorian and Barbara B. (Barbara) entered into a stipulation that formed the basis of a paternity judgment and child support order. The parties stipulated that Dorian was the father of John R.B. (John), born November 8,1979, and that Dorian would make a payment of $30.00 per week to the clerk of court for John's support. This case arises out of an Order to Show…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. DoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Martin Ex Rel. Scoptur v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wisconsin v. LaxtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Schultz v. NatwickWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Society Insurance v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. SchulpiusWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lands' End, Inc. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Lands' End, Inc. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Lands' End, Inc. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API