Estate of Staniszewski
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
Denial of an Adjournment.
One of the grounds advanced by the appellant in this court to support her demand for a new trial is the fact that the trial court refused to grant her request for a continuance. That request had been based upon the fact that the appellant’s counsel had not been retained until that very morning. Counsel sought additional time to familiarize himself with the case and to prepare for the hearing. This is the type of request with which á judge is ordinarily sympathetic.
However, in the instant case, as Judge White carefully pointed out, such counsel was at least the sixth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of Hatten v. MonstedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Lazarus v. American Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Auseth v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Schwarz v. StracheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by4 opinions
- Silberman v. RoetheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Bihlmire v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966