Legal Opinion

Estate of Hatten v. Monsted

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1939PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 7, 1939:

Nelson, J.

The administrator contends that the court erred in finding that the note was in fact signed by decedent or that any part of it was in his handwriting; in finding that at the time the note was alleged to have been given, decedent was competent to conduct the transaction or to give the note alleged to have been given; in finding a valuable consideration sufficient to support the note and that the note, if executed and delivered by décedent, was given for those considerations; in finding that the note, if given, was not the result of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Park Falls State Bank v. FordyceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Estate of JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Lange v. HeckelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Odell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Elbinger v. Capitol & Teutonia Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Robert E. Pincus v. Pabst Brewing Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. First Wisconsin National Bank v. ObyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Kohler v. Kohler Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. Sowle v. BrittichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Jax v. JaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API