Legal Opinion

Lazarus v. American Motors Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1963PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

In order for the plaintiff to prevail, it was incumbent upon him to establish the existence of a contract with the defendant. The plaintiff contends that an enforceable contract was created under either of the following theories: (a) A contract arose when the plaintiff accepted the defendant’s purchase order and agreed to deliver steel within the terms of the contract; or (b) a contract arose when, under the inducement of the defendant’s offer, the plaintiff took substantial steps to perform.

The issue before this court is to be determined by the law of Illinois. The order called for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Knippel v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State ex rel. Webster Manufacturing Co. v. ReidWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bitker & Gerner Co. v. Green Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Haines v. Mid-Century InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Urhammer v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Entzminger v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API