Legal Opinion

Hunnicutt v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2007No. SC S55002; SC S55004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

In this proceeding to review a ballot title under ORS 250.085(2), we address two petitions that challenge the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 95 (2008). We consolidate the two ballot title challenges for purposes of this opinion.

Initiative Petition 95 (2008), if approved by the voters, would effectively abolish coordinated statewide land use planning in Oregon, limiting the application of the statewide land use planning goals to “areas of critical state concern” as defined in ORS 197.405. At present, the state has not designated any “areas of critical state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Portland General Electric Co. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Girod v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API