Legal Opinion

Torres v. Armond Cassil Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1982No. Docket 57585PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before this Court pursuant to an order of the Supreme Court remanding the case to this Court in lieu of granting leave to appeal. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (hereinafter appeal board) denying compensation.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant Armond Cassil Company as a laborer. Plaintiff worked in Adrian and lived in Detroit. Plaintiff’s foreman *693would drive plaintiff and other employees to and from their homes to the job, site in an employer-owned vehicle. In November, 1973, on the way home from work, plaintiff was injured when…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Howard v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Stark v. LE Myers CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Pappas v. Sport Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Teddy v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Estate of HarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Upton v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Forgach v. George Koch & Sons Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Woods v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API