Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Roe

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1998No. Docket 186031PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right an order granting judgment in favor of defendants in this action for a declaratory judgment. Plaintiff claimed that an exclusion in the automobile policy issued to defendants Wilbur and Maureen Roe relieved it of the duty to defend the Roes and pay damages on their behalf or indemnify them for the injuries suffered by their son, Michael Roe, in a vehicular accident. After entering an order reversing the trial court’s order and opinion and remanding the case for entiy of a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, this Court granted a rehearing. We again reverse and remand…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fire Insurance Exchange v. DiehlMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Vector Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Francis v. ScheperMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Chrysler v. Blue Arrow Transport LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. English v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Brown v. Indiana Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Argonaut Insurance Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. McCAUL v. MODERN TILE AND CARPET, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Specht v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API