Legal Opinion

In Re Bye

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1974No. Crim. 17626PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C, J.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the People appeal from an order directing the Narcotic Addict Evaluation Authority (NAEA) to discharge petitioner Charles Ray Bye from custody, and return him to outpatient status (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 3151) 1 as an individual theretofore duly committed under the civil addict program (§ 3000 et seq.). 2 The issue presented is whether due process principles enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471 [33 L.Ed.2d 484, 92 S.Ct. 2593] and its progeny dictate that before'NAEA may, pursuant to a finding…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re PodestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Safer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. MakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API