Legal Opinion

People v. Maki

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1985No. Crim. 23902PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, J.

We granted hearing in this case to clarify the standards for admitting documentary evidence at probation and parole revocation hearings. We will conclude that documentary hearsay evidence which does not fall within an exception to the hearsay rule may be admitted if there are sufficient indicia of reliability regarding the proffered material, and will affirm the trial court judgment revoking probation.

In 1981, following a negotiated plea to two counts of fraudulently issuing checks with insufficient funds (Pen. Code, § 476a), the court placed defendant Donald L. Maki on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Robert Frederick Taylor v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. People v. DeHoyosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API