Legal Opinion

People v. Ramirez

California Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1979No. Crim. 20076PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In this case we review the scope of the due process clauses of the California Constitution. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 7 subd. (a); id., § 15.) We hold that application of the clauses must be deter*264mined in the context of the individual’s due process liberty interest in freedom from arbitrary adjudicative procedures. Thus, when a person is deprived of a statutorily conferred benefit, due process analysis must start not with a judicial attempt to decide whether the statute has created an “entitlement” that can be defined as “liberty” or “property,” but with an assessment of what…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API