Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Chapnick v. East Cleveland City School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2001No. 01-90PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

From September 1990 through July 2000, appellant and crossappellee, East Cleveland City School District Board of Education (“board”), employed appellee and cross-appellant, Stephen Chapnick, in the position of business manager under a series of two-year contracts. These contracts contained the caption “Administrator’s Contract” and included the following language:

“WHEREAS, the Board of Education has determined it necessary to contract for the employment of an administrative officer pursuant to Section 3319.02, Ohio Revised Code, * * * the Board of Education has approved such recommendation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Grosser v. BoyOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Kabatek v. StackhouseOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Jones v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Maloney v. SherlockOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State ex rel. Scruggs v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Curran v. VincentOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State ex rel. National City Bank v. MaloneyOhio Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API