Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jones v. O'Connor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1999No. 98-1782PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Jones asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his complaint for a writ of mandamus. For the following reasons, however, we find this assertion to be meritless.

First, to the extent that Jones requested that Judge O’Connor rule on his motion for jail-time credit, his claim was rendered moot when Judge O’Connor subsequently denied the motion. Mandamus does not lie to compel an act that has already been performed. State ex rel. Wynn v. McCormick (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 420, 421, 696 N.E.2d 593.

Second, Jones had an adequate remedy at law by appeal to review any sentencing error by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sampson v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Harrell v. Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Wynn v. McCormickOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State, Ex Rel. Gooden v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rankin v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Sands v. Culotta (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State ex rel. Scruggs v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Chapnick v. East Cleveland City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Williams v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API