Legal Opinion

Massey v. WR Grace & Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 21, 1985No. 22362PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is a worker’s compensation case. Respondent claimant, David Massey, was denied benefits by the Industrial Commission because his injury was not job related. The circuit court reversed holding claimant had proved a com-pensable injury. We affirm.

Claimant is a sixty year old man who had been employed in appellant’s mineral ore plant for twelve years. His duties included throwing out large rocks before the ore mixture reached the grate. He worked seven days a week and had not missed a day in over a year at the time of the injury.

The day of the injury, claimant testified he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Mitchem v. FISKE-CARTER CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. Pacific Columbia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Brayboy v. Clark Heating Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Grayson v. Carter Rhoad FurnitureCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Massey v. WR Grace & CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API