Legal Opinion

Brayboy v. Clark Heating Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1991No. 23485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

Rudolph Brayboy (Brayboy) appeals Circuit Court’s affirmance of a Workers’ Compensation Commission Order, denying him further benefits.

We remand for further findings.

FACTS

On October 21, 1986, Brayboy injured his left knee while in the course and scope of his employment for Clark Heating Company, Inc. (Employer). The wound, sutured by a Dr. Boatwright, became infected in November, 1986. When the knee remained swollen and painful, Employer, on March 16, 1987, sent Brayboy to Dr. James W. Faulk, who performed a “McMurray’s Test,” an examination for determining whether cartilage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Able Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Cromer v. Newberry Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. Green v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Aristizabal v. I. J. Woodside-Division of Dan River, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Krell v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Mauldin v. Dyna-Color/Jack RabbitSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Lockridge v. Santens of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Gattis v. MURRELLS INLET VFW 10420Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Sanders v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API