Legal Opinion

Grayson v. Carter Rhoad Furniture

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 20, 1993No. 2110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge;

This is a workers’ compensation case. Jarvis Grayson sought additional temporary total disability benefits for an injury he suffered while employed at Carter Rhoad Furniture. The single commissioner denied the benefits and the full commission affirmed. On appeal, the circuit court reversed the full commission. Carter Rhoad appeals. We affirm.

Grayson’s job with Carter Rhoad was lifting and moving furniture. In August, 1990, he injured his back while working. In December, 1990, the treating physician, Dr. Graziano, re*252leased him to return to work, although he advised Grayson to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Massey v. WR Grace & CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mullinax v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Grayson v. Carter Rhoad FurnitureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Cranford v. Hutchinson ConstructionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Mullinax v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. State Accident Fund v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API