Legal Opinion

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF POLICE PENSION, ETC v. Burns

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 29, 1959No. 38476PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

The plaintiff in error will be called defendant and the defendant in error plaintiff or by name. Isaac E.. Burns was a regular member of the Police Department of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, from May 1, 1927, to July 1, 1949. On this last date he retired from that Department under the Statutes of Oklahoma and the Ordinances of the City of Oklahoma City then extant. He has ever since drawn a pension based on such laws which were 11 O.S.1951 § 541k (Section 1, Ch. 13A, Title 11, p. 79, Oklahoma Session Laws 1949) and Oklahoma City Ordinance No. 8063. The Act of the Legislature…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Sup v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Board of Trustees of Policemen's Pension Fund v. SchuppCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Cross v. GrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Ross v. Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Baker v. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension & Retirement System v. KernSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Atchison v. Retirement Board of Police Retirement System of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Snider v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API