Legal Opinion

People v. Richter

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1896No. Crim. No. 156PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Lassen County setting aside an information. W. T. Hasten, Judge. Defendants were accused, by information, of the crime of altering the brand on a certain steer, with intent to steal the same.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Lassen County setting aside an information. W. T. Hasten, Judge. Defendants were accused, by information, of the crime of altering the brand on a certain steer, with intent to steal the same. Defendant Richter moved "the superior court to set aside the information on the grounds that before the filing of the said information he had not been legally committed by a magistrate: 1. In that there was not sufficient evidence produced before the magistrate to show the commission of a public offense, and that there was not sufficient cause to believe the…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

After the district attorney had filed in the superior court an information against the defendant accusing him of a felony, the defendant moved the court to set the same aside on various grounds, and his motion was granted. From this order the people have appealed. The defendant objects to the hearing of the appeal upon the ground that the order is not appeal-able. Section 1238 of the Penal Code prescribes the cases in which an appeal may be taken by the people,, and the present order is not included therein.

The appeal is dismissed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State v. RidenbaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API