Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of Gooding

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1953No. 8062Published

1DissentTaylor, Justice

The doctrine that a party may not challenge the constitutionality of a statute if he has accepted benefits conferred by the statute, is an application of the equitable doctrine of estoppel. This court has many times recognized the general rule that estoppel will not be invoked against the government or its agencies except where manifest justice requires its application. Common School Dist. No. 61 v. Bank & Trust Co., 50 Idaho 711, 4 P.2d 342; Lloyd Crystal Post No. 20 v. Jefferson County, 72 Idaho 158, 237 P.2d 348.

The generalizations from the opinions of the courts cited are stated by the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People Ex Rel. Battista v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cameron v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employes & Moving Picture Operators of the United States & Canada, Local Union No. 384Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API