Legal Opinion
Pierce Oil Corp. v. Phoenix Refining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 15, 1922No. 172PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke
In 1913 the defendant in error, the Phoenix Refining Company (herein designated the Phoenix Company), a corporation organized under the laws of Oklahoma, erected an oil refinery at Sand Springs, in that State. In the same year the plaintiff in error, the Pierce Oil Corporation (herein designated the Pierce Company), a corporation organized under the laws of Virginia, erected a refinery at Sand Springs, and also constructed a pipe line, wholly within the State of Oklahoma, to the Cushing Oil Field, a distance of thirty-three miles.
Beginning in 1915, the Pierce Company transported oil for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baltic Mining Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pullman Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Wall v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Pierce v. Somerset RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Currier v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Budd v. BishopWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- The California Oregon Power Company, a Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, the State of Oregon, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.