Peterson v. Mayer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of $154.51, in the municipal court of St. Paul, ordered and entered on the pleadings.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The allegations of the complaint are that the plaintiff performed labor and work for defendant for seven anda fraction months *469at an agreed sum per month, payable at the end of each month. The answer admits the employment at the sum alleged for each and every month that plaintiff should work for defendant, and that the. plaintiff worked the length of time stated, but alleges, by way of defence, that during all the time of his service the plaintiff stole and appropriated to his own use large sums of defendant’s money which came into his hands in the course of his employment, and that, as soon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leeds v. LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Elliott v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Libhart v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- Nelichka v. EsterlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Kohn v. FandelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
3Cited by21 opinions
- Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Hahl v. KelloggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Bessman v. BessmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- McGrath v. CannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Von Heyne v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.