Boone v. Martinez
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
This case presents the question of when a bar is liable for injuries resulting from a fight between two patrons of the bar. The court of appeals held that although an attack may be sudden and unforeseeable, employees of the bar had a duty to protect a patron once the assault commenced. We disagree and instead hold that because a fight between patrons of a bar was sudden and unforeseeable, the bar was not liable in this case for resulting injuries to the patrons.
In December 1991, Aristeo Martinez assaulted Michael Boone in the Palace Bar, which is located in Albert…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Baber v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Schwingler v. DoebelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Veytsman v. New York Palace, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.