Veytsman v. New York Palace, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
In this appeal, we consider Maryland tort law concerning the duty of a restaurant or tavern owner to patrons who were assaulted on the business premises by other patrons. After they were assaulted by fellow guests inside the New York Palace restaurant, Edward and Tatyana Veytsman filed suit against the restaurant in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. At the end of a three-day jury trial, the circuit court granted the restaurant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, ruling that the Veytsmans failed to present sufficient evidence that the New York Palace owed a duty to protect them…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashburn v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Remsburg v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Felder v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Southland Corp. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Troxel v. Iguana Cantina, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Davis v. StapfCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Davis v. StapfCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Nguyen v. MGM National Harbor, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- SOLESKY v. TraceyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.