Legal Opinion
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 24, 2005No. A04-188PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s order granting respondents’ motion for a directed verdict on appellant’s legal-malpractice claim. Because we conclude that the district court erred by granting the motion, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Jerry’s Enterprises, Inc. (Jerry’s) owns and operates grocery stores. Respondents are law firm Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., which began representing Jerry’s in 1987; attorney Tim Stoltman, Jerry’s primary contact at the law firm; and attorney Gary Renneké, a Larkin, Hoffman attorney who represented Jerry’s at the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Svetlana Virovtseva and Brandon Robinson v. Ciresi Conlin LLP, Kathleen Flynn Peterson, and Colin PetersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026