Legal Opinion

Bocchino v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 18, 1998No. SC 15660PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

In this action to recover proceeds pursuant to a homeowner’s insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant. The trial court determined that the action had not been brought within one year of the date of the loss, as required by the policy, and that the accidental failure of suit statute, General Statutes § 52-592,2 did not operate to save the plaintiffs action. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that § 52-592 (a) did not save the action. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The facts…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Peabody N.E., Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API