Legal Opinion

Harris v. Pernsley

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 1987No. Civ. A. 82-1847PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiffs assert this civil rights action on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated in regard to conditions of confinement in prisons in the City of Philadelphia. Plaintiffs allege that Commonwealth and City officials responsible for the conditions of confinement in City prisons are violating the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. A hearing on plaintiffs’ motion to approve a settlement agreement between plaintiffs and the City defendants, 1 presented preliminarily to the court on October…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Harris v. ReevesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. United States v. BASF-Inmont Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  5. Williams v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API