State v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis of practicing dentistry without a license. From an order, Waite, J., denying a motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
Dr. Taylor, the appellant, was convicted of the offense of practicing dentistry without a license, in violation of chapter 117, p. 127, Laws 1907. He was at the time a licensed physician and surgeon, and claims that such license entitles him to engage in the incidental practice of dentistry on his own patients. Dr. Taylor extracted two teeth for one of his patients and took an impression in wax of the mouth and cavities. He sent this impression to a dental laboratory, where artificial teeth were made and returned to Dr. Taylor, who delivered them to his patient and received a fee of some $38…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. VandersluisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Pelton v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. DeFranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. BeckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899
- State ex rel. Flickinger v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Stoike v. WesemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926