Stoike v. Weseman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff is an osteopathic physician, licensed to practice in Minnesota; that the defendants are husband and wife, and that plaintiff was employed to attend the wife in childbirth; that he performed the services he was employed to render, and that defendants refused to pay him anything therefor. The answer admitted these allegations and set up as a defense that plaintiff was not an authorized medical practitioner and had no license to practice midwifery, and that the services he rendered were not performed in an emergency. A demurrer to the answer was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Johnson v. WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1941