Legal Opinion

Stoike v. Weseman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1926No. 25,296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is an osteopathic physician, licensed to practice in Minnesota; that the defendants are husband and wife, and that plaintiff was employed to attend the wife in childbirth; that he performed the services he was employed to render, and that defendants refused to pay him anything therefor. The answer admitted these allegations and set up as a defense that plaintiff was not an authorized medical practitioner and had no license to practice midwifery, and that the services he rendered were not performed in an emergency. A demurrer to the answer was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API