State v. Beck
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Indictment charging defendant with practicing dentistry in violation of statute. Heard on demurrer to indictment. Demurrer sustained and indictment quashed.
1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.
The indictment charges, in. substance, that the defendant did unlawfully practice dentistry in Newport on the first day of August, 1898, without first having obtained a certificate from the Board of Eegistration in Dentistry, and without first having caused his name and place of business to be registered with said board.
The defendant has filed a special plea in bar to said indictment, in which he sets up, in brief, that at the time aforesaid he held a certificate in due form from the State Board of Health ; that he was qualified to practice medicine and surgery by reason of the possession by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. VandersluisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. AxtellIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Hines v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- State ex rel. Flickinger v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Little v. Conflict of Interest CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Continental Casualty Company v. StreetTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- State v. DussaultSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.