Legal Opinion

Crews v. American Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1941No. 29048PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The plaintiffs in error instituted this action, as plaintiffs, in the district court. Demurrers to their petition, amended petition, and second amended petition were sustained in regular order.

One Charles G. Shull, a former Bank Commissioner for the State of Oklahoma, was designated a defendant in the amended petitions, in addition to American Surety Company of New York, who was surety on his official bond. The demurrers sustained to the plaintiffs’ pleadings were filed on behalf of said surety company. Consequently, the term “defendant,” as hereinafter used in our reference to the parties as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. CockrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Mills v. American Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Riches v. Hadlock, Bank Com'r.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  5. American Surety Co. of New York v. SteenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stubblefield v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Wagoner v. SaunierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Bynum v. Western Surety Co. of Sioux Falls, S.D.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Standard Surety & Cas. Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API