Legal Opinion

Wagoner v. Saunier

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1981No. 52224PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

The dispositive question here is whether the district court’s midtrial party substitution order — by which a corporation [Saun-myer, Inc.] was made a party-defendant in lieu of its individually-sued president and principal stockholder [Robert M. Saunier]— is free from reversible error because it meets the minimum notice-and-fairness standards of the constitution. We answer in the affirmative.

Plaintiff’s intended adversary in the suit was the party which defectively renovated a fireplace chimney in his recently-acquired residence. In midtrial, that entity came to be identified…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Quenzer v. QuenzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Williams v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Garrett v. GordonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API