Legal Opinion

People v. Ford

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2015No. S212940PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CUÉLLAR, J.

Defendant William J. Ford appeals from an order awarding victim restitution. He contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to conduct the April 6, 2012, hearing prescribing the amount of restitution he owed because his term of probation — including the condition of restitution— had expired one week earlier. For support, defendant relies on Penal Code section 1203.3, subdivision (b)(5), which provides that “[njothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the court from modifying the dollar amount of a restitution order pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Orcilla v. Big Sur, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Garibotti v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API