Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Recreation District v. Hix

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 28, 1957No. 18053PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

Plaintiff in error will hereinafter be referred to as the District; defendants in error as petitioners or by name.

Pursuant to chapter 199 of the 1955 Session Laws, The Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Recreation District was formed, and two parcels of land owned by the Hix’s and Beulah Blair were included within the boundaries of the District without their consent. Petitioners brought an action in the district court to have their land excluded from the District. They allege that each of the two tracts owned by them was in excess of forty acres; that the land was used primarily for agricultural…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Melendez v. JohnsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Zeigler v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  4. Hight v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. De Fontenay v. ChildsMontana Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fields v. Anderson Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. Carp v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. FD Interests v. Fairways at Buffalo RunColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Cox v. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Cox v. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API