Legal Opinion
Hight v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1934No. Civil No. 3439PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.
On April 26, 1933, LeRoy Patten was injured while discharging his dnties as an employee of Dr. R. J. Hight, and soon afterwards made application to the Industrial Commission for compensation. Following a hearing the Commission made an award in his favor and the petitioner, Dr. Hight, against whom the award runs and who was not insured under the Compensation Law, has by certiorari brought the matter here for review.
It appears that at the time of the accident the petitioner was farming about 1,000 acres of land and owned around 400 head of cattle. The land was not in one body but in several…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beyer v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Davis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Gordon v. BusterTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Gordon v. BusterTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Greischar v. St. Mary's CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sherrill & La Follette v. HerringArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Melendez v. JohnsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Marshall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Zeigler v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- Hughes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.