Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cox v. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 5, 1959No. 18230Published

1DissentJustice Hall

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and the specially concurring opinions.

The right of a bank to apply general deposits standing in the name of and belonging to a depositor to the payment of such depositor’s past due indebtedness to the bank is a right generally recognized throughout the United States. Colorado, as evidenced by numerous decisions of this and the former Court of Appeals, recognizes this right.

*594In Manitou v. First National Bank, 37 Colo. 344, 86 Pac. 75, it was said:

“When a bank holds a depositor’s note, it has the right at any time during the day on which it falls…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Commercial Bank v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Botkin v. PyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  4. Town of Manitou v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Boettcher v. Colorado Nat. BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API