Cox v. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Hall
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and the specially concurring opinions.
The right of a bank to apply general deposits standing in the name of and belonging to a depositor to the payment of such depositor’s past due indebtedness to the bank is a right generally recognized throughout the United States. Colorado, as evidenced by numerous decisions of this and the former Court of Appeals, recognizes this right.
*594In Manitou v. First National Bank, 37 Colo. 344, 86 Pac. 75, it was said:
“When a bank holds a depositor’s note, it has the right at any time during the day on which it falls…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Commercial Bank v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Botkin v. PyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Town of Manitou v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Boettcher v. Colorado Nat. BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.