Legal Opinion

Fleischman v. Reading

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1957No. Appeal, 90PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The negligence of the driver of the defendant’s truck in this case was pronounced, flagrant, and practically uncontradicted. Halted on the wrong side of the road, he pulled out into a lane of traffic not his own, and collided with a car being driven by the plaintiff, George M. Fleischman, inflicting injuries which the jury evaluated at $20,000. The defendant municipality has appealed to this Court seeking judgment *185n.o.v., on the contention that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. It also asks, in the alternative, for a new trial, advancing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Schofield v. DruschelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Long v. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Rodgers v. AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. Taylor v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Lockhart v. ListSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Gregorius v. Safeway Steel Scaffolds Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API