Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Ross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1948No. 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.:

The appeal is on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court entered on a verdict in favor of the defendant. The action was for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff by reason of an automobile collision between a Hudson owned by defendant, Carl Ross, in which she was riding as a paid passenger, and a Chevrolet operated by Robert Clyde Campbell. The Hudson was moving in a southerly direction on the Springboro Pike on Route 741. The Chevrolet was moving in a northerly direction. The accident occurred about 8:30 o’clock A. M. on December 31, 1943.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guth v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Larison v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Scheu v. ScheuOhio Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. Fleischman v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Turner v. CaldwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Fleischman v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API