Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Druschel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1948No. Appeals, 55 and 56PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Edward F. Schofield, appellee, instituted separate actions in trespass against James L. Druschel, appellant, under the Survival Act of 1937, and under the Wrongful Death Statutes. The causes of action arose when Druschel, driving an automobile east on Route No. 422, at night without lights, and on the wrong side of the road, collided with the automobile driven by Schofield and proceeding west. As a result of the collision Ruth V. Schofield, appellee’s wife, sustained injuries which resulted in her death. Edward F. Schofield was joined as an additional defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Bowman v. StoumanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Reidinger v. Lewis Jones, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Van Note v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Fleischman v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Lockhart v. ListSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Gregorius v. Safeway Steel Scaffolds Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Greco v. 7-Up Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Unangst v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API