Legal Opinion

State v. Hurita

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 2016No. 132652; A155875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHUMAN, S. J.

Defendant seeks modification of one of the conditions of probation that the court imposed on her after she was convicted of misdemeanor stalking and second-degree criminal trespass. The condition at issue prohibited her from being anywhere in Lincoln County north of Cape Foulweather. According to defendant, that condition is overly restrictive because it is not reasonably related to her reformation or the protection of the public. We agree. We therefore hold the condition invalid and remand for resentencing.

Defendant has for several years had something of an obsession with a man…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Hitesman/PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API