Legal Opinion

State v. Bassett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 18, 2015No. 114377, 120497; A151216, A151217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

This is a consolidated criminal appeal in which defendant seeks modification of the terms of his probation. Defendant contends that the special probation conditions in Case No. 120497 and Case No. 114377 are invalid because they are not reasonably related either to protection of the public or to defendant reformation and are more restrictive than necessary. In Case No. 120497, we affirm without published discussion. In Case No. 114377, we conclude that the special probation condition was impermissibly overbroad and, therefore, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

The pertinent facts are as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Hitesman/PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HuritaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API